3 ms·
They're not a single point of failure, they're one of a myriad of important analysis of weak points and areas to improve. Note that in the article the scientist
by SolaceQuantum 7y ago
They're not a single point of failure, they're one of a myriad of important analysis of weak points and areas to improve. Note that in the article the scientists are not defining the illness, merely were able to identify the source of the sound.
I'm mostly skeptical at the skepticism. Why wouldn't one want to retain world class researching talent to be queried at a moment's notice regarding anything that could possibly threaten the country?
- sverige 7y agoWhy would a retainer be something we should put tax dollars toward? Why not pay them when they are needed, instead of paying them for who they are? Reminds me of Nixon trying to get rid of the Tea Tasting Board. https://www.nytimes.com/1970/05/13/archives/nixon-drops-plan-to-abolish-tea-testing-board.html https://www.nytimes.com/1970/05/13/archives/nixon-drops-plan...
- SolaceQuantum 7y agoThey are paid for when they're needed. They've been scheduled for 15 studies.