Ah you're right that I missed postsecondary. It should be: >Looking at the text of the fine, you can't charge money to teach adults things in a cirriculum ("of

Ah you're right that I missed postsecondary. It should be: >Looking at the text of the fine, you can't charge money to teach adults things in a cirriculum ("offer education" in their parlence) in a physical location without state approval. It's an important distinction, but I don't think that huge game changer. Still looks clearly unconstitutional. I could literally rent a storefront and recite audio books and that would be illegal. How is that a constitutional law? Note: educational books often have a curriculum built in. The difference between a book and a class is just the medium it's presented. Limiting the spread of information is what dictatorships do. There is a reason it's the very first amendment.