2 ms·
Well that's obviously wrong because some people used to think that a computer would never beat a human at chess. It follows logically that no one can ever overe
by pgcj_poster 7y ago
Well that's obviously wrong because some people used to think that a computer would never beat a human at chess. It follows logically that no one can ever overestimate how quickly technology will develop.
- scott_s 7y agoThe form of your argument is that some people were wrong about a subset of X, therefore the opposite attitude of those people must be true for all of X. That's clearly not a valid argument.
- pgcj_poster 7y agoAnd Bill Gates said that 640K should be enough for anybody.