In the first two cases, humans have invented more effective ways of doing a task than the biological methods. Kasparov acknowledges that computers are superior

In the first two cases, humans have invented more effective ways of doing a task than the biological methods. Kasparov acknowledges that computers are superior to unassisted humans at playing chess, so how is the third case (computer chess) different? [B]rute-force methods of recreating systems are no longer working. On the contrary, brute-force algorithms are working better and better as a result of the trend currently known as Moore's law. The faster the hardware, the less intelligent the software running on it has to be to do the same job.