>So yes, they didn't seem to be stigmatized. Or the grandparent (1/2) and parent (1/4) just happened to be female (which is likely, see also: Haldane's rule) i

>So yes, they didn't seem to be stigmatized. Or the grandparent (1/2) and parent (1/4) just happened to be female (which is likely, see also: Haldane's rule) in which case they probably had little problem getting laid (side effects include pregnancy which if not treated can lead to children) no matter how stigmatized they were assuming modern humans behavior is any indication. Having a kid is no guarantee they (and presumably their kid) weren't the lowest status person in the tribe (i.e. stigmatized) on account of who their parents were. That said, it's entirely possible the people in question were too concerned with month to month and year to year survival to care about that kind of thing.