4 ms·
Solving a puzzle would be much more fun than identifying street lights and then waiting 20 seconds for Google's RECAPTCHA to "check" the result. Unfortunately b
by vortico 7y ago
Solving a puzzle would be much more fun than identifying street lights and then waiting 20 seconds for Google's RECAPTCHA to "check" the result. Unfortunately both of these things can be easily broken with bots. The data Google tracks/checks is what's difficult for bots.
- danieldk 7y agoSolving a puzzle would be much more fun than identifying street lights But that wouldn't give Google free data annotations.
- SiempreViernes 7y agoIt would be nice if we could get back to those good old days when doing a reCaptcha helped digitize books.
- djmips 7y agoHow did that work if the purpose of answering a captcha is matching with a known answer. If you were helping solve then it would imply you would get a few that didn't pass you through the gate even if you answered correctly.
- thepangolino 7y agoThose used to have two words. One known and one not. To purposely fuck the system you’d have to guess which is the unknown word.
- rocqua 7y agoTwo challenges. One where the system has high confidence on what the correct label is, one where it has low confidence.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]