Epigenetics is indicating that our traditional view of genetics is probably just completely wrong, but going with that traditional view - it's not that an envir

Epigenetics is indicating that our traditional view of genetics is probably just completely wrong, but going with that traditional view - it's not that an environment changes a species, but randomness. And traits randomly evolved that end up beneficial are preserved in the lineage due to increased survivability. Jungle like environments tend to be extremely favorable for the survival of intelligent species which means natural selection starts to play less of a role. Well it does play a role, but in different ways. For instance modern humans are continuing to evolve even though natural selection, in terms of man against environment, is now playing very near 0 role. Instead the factor being selected for now is simple fertility. Humanity will tend to evolve along the characteristics of those families have 3, 4 and more children - while those having 2 or fewer children will gradually fade from the gene pool. So natural selection has in some ways become voluntary, which is quite paradoxical. However in less developed areas, it's still alive in some ways. For instance if an individual in subsahara Africa somehow developed a genetically heritable mutation making him immune to malaria, it's reasonably likely that all subsaharan Africans would, gradually, become immune to malaria. We can only conclude, putting aside epigenetic factors once again, that such mutations are much less common than e.g. those to the shape of a bird's beak.