4 ms·
Dear "Seattle Woman": while you're in there, please dump Capital One's junk mail database, and set their address label printer on fire. Sincerely, another Seat
by girzel 7y ago
Dear "Seattle Woman": while you're in there, please dump Capital One's junk mail database, and set their address label printer on fire.
Sincerely, another Seattle resident with a mailbox.
- dmix 7y agoThey really do send out a whole lotta junk mail, even here in Canada. I don't see other banks doing that.
- heartbreak 7y agoHaving a bigger marketing budget than everyone else is Capital One’s approach to banking.
- dmix 7y agoTheir mobile apps are top notch though. I used a card in the past and it came with free credit scoring and the mobile apps were better designed (UI and performance) than most. At least here in my country. It even had automatic categorization of spending in a Mint.com style.
- ac29 7y agohttps://www.optoutprescreen.com/ https://www.optoutprescreen.com/ should handle most of that. Yes, its legit [0]. [0] https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0148-prescreened-credit-and-insurance-offers https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0148-prescreened-credi...
- technothrasher 7y agoI took down the mailbox at my house and now use my business address for all my mail, because bulk junk mail doesn't get delivered to business addresses. Targeted credit offers do still get delivered, unfortunately. But the amount of junk mail in general is about 10% of what it was. Works well, though I do often get accused of being a Unibomber type when I tell people they can't send mail to my house address because I removed my mailbox. The bank that holds my mortgage also came calling because the USPS declared my lot "vacant" to HUD after I did it, and that confused everybody.
- elliekelly 7y ago> I took down the mailbox at my house Serious question... is this legal?
- olmec 7y agoWhy would it be illegal to not have a mailbox? It's your property. Do whatever you please.
- elliekelly 7y agoMailboxes live in this weird property-right limbo (that I don’t know really anything about) where the homeowner buys it but it is “property of” the US Postal Service. I found this[1] Supreme Court case that sort of touches on how the property rights work. [1] https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/453/114/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/453/114/
- git-pull 7y agoI don't think that's what they're saying though. They're talking about what the mailbox while it's in use. I didn't find anything mentioning boxes being property of the USPS, they use the term "authorized repository." When it's in use, it's still property of the private entity, but it's usage is subject to the rules of USPS. (I'm not a lawyer) My understanding it they can remove the USPS box (looking at what postal workers said on Quora), but they wouldn't be part of the mail system anymore. I guess they could have mail forwarded to a new box, or else it'd be undeliverable. https://www.nytimes.com/1981/06/26/us/justices-upholds-law-prohibiting-unstamped-matter-in-mailboxes.html https://www.nytimes.com/1981/06/26/us/justices-upholds-law-p... > Writing for the majority, Associate Justice William H. Rehnquist said that no one was required to receive mail or to have a mailbox but that once a postal customer provides a box for receiving mail he implicitly agrees to abide by postal regulations on its use. Audio/transcript: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1980/80-608 https://www.oyez.org/cases/1980/80-608
- WalterBright 7y agoCO finally stopped sending me junk mail after I'd send back their offers with "stop sending me these" written in red crayon across the application form. I did it for months.