> Imagine you work hard editing for a day / days. That bug just cost you X revenue. Multiply for the entire month. Counterpoint - it didn't cost you anything,

> Imagine you work hard editing for a day / days. That bug just cost you X revenue. Multiply for the entire month. Counterpoint - it didn't cost you anything, it's just lost opportunity. Imagine you work hard editing for a day / days and literally no ones watches the videos you produce. You have no cost, but also no revenue. I understand why people want to criticize YT, but if you are using a service that will gladly pay the costs for your distribution with no upfront obligation and no on-going payment, then what do you expect? I mean this is why unions exist. Not suggesting that unions are the right answer here. In fact, I really don't know what the solution is, but I don't think either side of the table has a solution that will solve everyone's problems unilaterally.