3 ms·
>This Time It's Not Different. Except we have 1,000,000 times more compute? And the whole world is wired up.
by sgt101 7y ago
>This Time It's Not Different.
Except we have 1,000,000 times more compute?
And the whole world is wired up.
- gumby 7y agoA million times more than a KL-10 isn’t they much when compared to a 80 giganode machine with a 10^5 fanout, even if it runs at only 100 Hz.
- sgt101 7y agoOh - I agree with that; IMO the AI of today and the next 40+ years (my life, probably) is not going to be close to human equiv, or mouse equiv. But it doesn't need to be. But AI is, today, a really useful set of new tools, which takes a lot of expertise to wield successfully. I expect that progress for the next decade will be slower than most people think, but I still think we will get some improvement over the current state of the art, and there is a lot of art to propagate and utilize. And mouse equiv is not an issue for me. We have a lot of mice around. Same for humans. We are not short of autonomous agents with common sense, full on NLP and a strong grasp of naive physics. Goodness me, they even come with a self repairing all terrain chassis! What we are short of (right now) is agents that can make rational sense of large scale, rapidly changing, complex and incomplete data; and can make and enact decisions over said data.