4 ms·

You don't need batteries with nuclear, at all. There's also less habitat destruction, less issue with bird strikes, less people falling off towers, less issues

You don't need batteries with nuclear, at all. There's also less habitat destruction, less issue with bird strikes, less people falling off towers, less issues with "view obstruction".

danaris 7y ago
I think he meant including the batteries in the solar/wind costs, which would make nuclear (relatively) cheaper.
- teabee89 7y ago
  This is what I meant indeed. Edited original question.