4 ms·
Yes, but subject to claimant's approval if you did not remove the offending sections.
by anticensor 7y ago
Yes, but subject to claimant's approval if you did not remove the offending sections.
- dvtrn 7y agoA part of me feels like claimants will find a way of gaming this and making their approval a series of endlessly nudged goalposts...given the way IP holders are already taking advantage of the tools already at their disposal.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- anticensor 7y agoNo, two rounds max; both parties lose (suspect's video deleted and claimant gets a strike) it is not resolved in two rounds.
- dvtrn 7y agoSo the claimant still, invariably get what they want, which is a pulled/not published video? That doesn’t sound like both parties losing to me.
- anticensor 7y agoYou seem to have forgot the 3 strike rule.
- dvtrn 7y agoNo I really didn’t-could do without the implication, why don’t we and leave the personal jabs about what I forgot or didn’t out of this and stick to the issue. I don’t believe as designed that even three strikes does well at (pardon the pun) striking a balance between content creators and content ID claimants. YouTube’s own behavior, leading up to where we sit now, and the behavior of claimants gives me no reason to give either party the benefit of the doubt or faith in how they purport to be handling content claims. I forgot nothing, friend.