4 ms·
This is wrong on many levels. 7-8 states have more tigers than Bengal. Sundarban tigers are not man-eaters by default Tiger census is tricky business, but the
by j0j 7y ago
This is wrong on many levels.
7-8 states have more tigers than Bengal.
Sundarban tigers are not man-eaters by default
Tiger census is tricky business, but these numbers are as legit as they can get (especially given, outside of India, BD and Nepal, no other countries have serious population of tigers in the wild). I mean, what other numbers would you trust?
- j0j 7y agoIn case you want a reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indian_states_by_wildlife_population https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indian_states_by_wildl...