3 ms·
> for the most part, is a terrible standard for main content. You should be able to read it for the all. You can read it, but many people do not have high-per
by papln 7y ago
> for the most part,
is a terrible standard for main content. You should be able to read it for the all.
You can read it, but many people do not have high-performance monitor and high-performance eyes.
Users can configure monitor/browser defaults for contrast and text however they like; web devs shouldn't try to forcibly reduce constrast for the primary content that is supposed to be the main recipient of visual attention.
- rimliu 7y agoHow about not trying to back your personal dislike with some army of phantom users?
- lucasmullens 7y agoDo you disagree that there exists people with bad eyesight?
- rimliu 7y agoI myself have bad eyesight. I can read that website perfectly fine. And author owns the original commenter nothing so does not really deserve this kind of attack. And most importantly — very high contrast (pure black on pure white) is actually bad.
- noitsnot 7y agoI can assure you that developers are not the archenemy of implementing good color schemes...most of the time. The Creative Director and six Editors listed on the About page probably have more say in why they can't read their own work on certain monitors.