What Chomsky points to as a cause (wealth distribution) I might argue is an effect. Those few with the ability to do so, continue the growth while others are le

What Chomsky points to as a cause (wealth distribution) I might argue is an effect. Those few with the ability to do so, continue the growth while others are left behind. Eventually for the wealthy too the growth will stop. This leads to violence and large scale violence resets the wealth inequality (temporarily). Peace depends on continued real growth.