I'm a big Rust fan, but right now, Rust is still missing a few important features that C++ can offer. Most of those are in progress and will materialize eventu

I'm a big Rust fan, but right now, Rust is still missing a few important features that C++ can offer. Most of those are in progress and will materialize eventually. * const generics: landing relatively soon but still not there * const/constexpr: support is getting better , but is still very limited right now * lack of higher kinded types prevents things that are quite easy to do with templates. The GAT (generic associated types) is being worked on but nowhere near completion * obviously the library ecosystem is tiny and immature compared to what C++ has to offer Feature wise I believe that Rust will be on somewhat equal footing to C++ in a few years, at which point I won't see any reason to use C++ over Rust, except if you rely on certain libraries - or in a domain where Rusts trait system is just inferior to classes + inheritance.