> Whatever you imagined in imagining God as the greatest thing, Graham’s number is inconceivably larger still. And despite that, there are still more numbers b

> Whatever you imagined in imagining God as the greatest thing, Graham’s number is inconceivably larger still. And despite that, there are still more numbers between 0 and 1 than increments required to reach Graham's number. It seems to me like you are assuming that conceptions of god and integers share the same cardinality when I'm not so sure that is clearly the case.