3 ms·
It is arguable that no such editor exists. Take away the Lisp and you are already very unlike Emacs.
by NateEag 7y ago
It is arguable that no such editor exists.
Take away the Lisp and you are already very unlike Emacs.
- TylerE 7y agoIt's possible to write a language that is arguably a lisp, but without sexprs. Elixir is one that comes to mind (It has the "big" Lisp things, like hygienic macros). Actually, Erlangs concurrency model might well work very well for emacs, since you can spawn off hundreds of independent tasks with close to zero overhead, and use all available cores to run them on.
- NateEag 7y agoA good point. Sweet-expressions might be an example of such a language implemented as a Lisp reader macro, in fact. https://dwheeler.com/readable/sweet-expressions.html https://dwheeler.com/readable/sweet-expressions.html