4 ms·
That's true, but those distributed goods primarily come from rural areas. Obviously we need both rural and urban areas, but I suppose my "born in a small town"
by sprainedankles 7y ago
That's true, but those distributed goods primarily come from rural areas.
Obviously we need both rural and urban areas, but I suppose my "born in a small town" bias wants a better balance between the two than we currently have. For the benefit of both!
- 0xB31B1B 7y agoAt least in the US, I feel a “better balance” would mean extreme missing middle housing production in the most productive cities so that the difference in the cost of housing between cities and rural areas would decline. I’d also be supportive of promoting actual “small towns” like those areas across much of the Midwest and rust belt that have a dense historic center and allow one to live a car free or reduced car lifestyle. What we do not need is more low density single family home car dependent living space.
- bradleyjg 7y agoI guess it depends on what metric we use to measure quantity but I’d guess that by many measures those goods primarily come from urbanized areas outside the US. Which once again points to the environmental benefits of density, particularly near deep ocean ports.