3 ms·
Insurance is best when covering replaceable things: cars, houses, etc. Had this guy had insurance, he’d likely have been compensated (for sure better than nothi
by city41 7y ago
Insurance is best when covering replaceable things: cars, houses, etc. Had this guy had insurance, he’d likely have been compensated (for sure better than nothing), but would still be without his watches.
- otterley 7y agoIn this particular instance, the victim was collecting these items not for their sentimental value, but for their monetary value, as he was planning to fund his retirement with them. So here, I suspect the victim would have been compensated fairly -- and reasonably satisfied to receive payment -- in cash, as opposed to replacement of the lost items.