3 ms·
Is there any reason you couldn't have just had Wordpress generate HTML that you then statically cached?
by jackowayed 16y ago
Is there any reason you couldn't have just had Wordpress generate HTML that you then statically cached?
- PStamatiou 16y agoI wanted to learn something new. That's probably the only reason I went with Jekyll. :)
- jackowayed 16y agoThat's reasonable :) I love Jekyll, so I have no objection to you switching. Just pointing out that there were probably much faster ways to get the same speedup. Feel free to email me if you need any help getting the last bits figured out. I use jekyll for blog.danieljackoway.com and danieljackoway.com, and I've done some weird stuff with it (like pages that are generated purely through the layout + YAML frontmatter--no "content"). Plus I'd just like to see the redesign early :)