3 ms·
Pls source your claims https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259766087_Rate_of_tree_carbon_accumulation_increases_continuously_with_tree_size https://www.res
by avip 7y ago
Pls source your claims https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259766087_Rate_of_tree_carbon_accumulation_increases_continuously_with_tree_size https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259766087_Rate_of_t...
Maybe instead of "debunked", you meant to say "this is a controversial issue".
Here's a better source to support your claims: http://www.co2science.org/subject/f/summaries/forestold.php http://www.co2science.org/subject/f/summaries/forestold.php
- ricardobeat 7y agoYou’re right, I should. Was on mobile and in a bit of a hurry. Quote from the second link: > with respect to the Brazilian forests in the central Amazon - about 50% of their above-ground biomass is contained in less than the largest 10% of their trees
- recusancy 7y agoCO2 Science is a fossil fuel funded climate denial center. https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Center_for_the_Study_of_Carbon_Dioxide_and_Global_Change https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Center_for_the_Study_o...
- avip 7y agoOk. Why do climate deniers find it important to convince us old forests are important for CO2 balance maintenance?