4 ms·
The elephant in the room with these prototype systems is that they currently leverage the excess capacity of existing industrial infrastructure. The chemistry i
by jandrewrogers 7y ago
The elephant in the room with these prototype systems is that they currently leverage the excess capacity of existing industrial infrastructure. The chemistry involved has unavoidably high power generation requirements because you are fighting a very steep thermodynamic gradient. At anything beyond prototype scales, the industrial infrastructure to provide the raw materials for these prototypes would need to be purpose-built at astronomical scales, including countless terawatts of power generation capacity that does not exist today.
The only scalable sequestration technology is biomass for the sole reason that it is the only method that does not require creating new power generation facilities to feed industrial chemistry plants at an unprecedented scale. Sequestering CO2 requires application of energy and mass on the same scale as the energy that was released by putting it into the atmosphere in the first place.
You can't cheat the laws of thermodynamics.
- netjiro 7y agoMissing a point here. GHG _over_time_ drastically adds more net energy to the earth system than is is used to create or capture them. This because they are opaque to infrared radiation that would otherwise be escaping from the earth system. So, GHG net heating effect is proportional to the amount of heat escape they block for as long as they remain in the atmosphere.
- andromeduck 7y agoWell we do have nuclear.
- marsokod 7y agoSo much this. The only place where those technologies could make sense would be on the industry generating a lot of CO2 in a concentrated manner. Or if you are creating a Mars colony, where it could be used to control your system.