5 ms·
>It's US law and GitHub (Microsoft) is bound by it. That seems like a terrible situation. What if tomorrow there's a US law that <insert ridiculous thing which
by JBiserkov 7y ago
>It's US law and GitHub (Microsoft) is bound by it.
That seems like a terrible situation. What if tomorrow there's a US law that <insert ridiculous thing which "everybody" says won't happen until the day it happens>
Maybe they should fork into GitHub US, GitHub EU and so on.
- lwhalen 7y agoThe 'Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it. Perhaps those affected could spin up a local Gitlab instance and migrate their data to it?
- yub 7y agoIf the law is believed to be unconstitutional, a US company can fight it in court. Otherwise, the company is required to comply with all laws applicable in the jurisdictions they operate. If there is a conflict, the US law has highest authority. In this case, if GitHub EU is owned by Microsoft, a US company, GitHub EU still must follow US rules. On the flip side, while GitHub EU must follow GDPR, GitHub US would not be required to do so.
- sebazzz 7y agoAre you sure? Isn't the point of Azure in Ireland that the US government won't be able to request data under the patriot act?
- yub 7y agoNope, the point of Azure in Ireland is to increase availability and decrease latency for EU clients. Microsoft challenged a warrant in 2013 to hand over emails stored in Ireland, but the SCOTUS vacated the rulings since it was moot by the CLOUD act of 2018, which allows the government to get data from US companies, no matter where the data physically is. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._United_States https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._United_St... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLOUD_Act https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CLOUD_Act
- def_true_false 7y agoHuh. Azure used to have a special region in Germany (joint operation with Deutsche Telekom) but it seems they've killed it last year.