4 ms·
You can't claim the $125 unless you assert you currently have credit monitoring and will for >= 6 months. You can't just go and claim $125 without lying or giv
by avsteele 7y ago
You can't claim the $125 unless you assert you currently have credit monitoring and will for >= 6 months. You can't just go and claim $125 without lying or giving your info to some additional org to enroll in credit monitoring.
- notyourwork 7y agoA lot of credit cards offer credit monitoring now a days.
- addicted 7y agoMost banks offer some sort of credit monitoring service, so you could leverage that.
- nemothekid 7y agoIf you have a credit card (I can say for sure, any Amex card and any Capital One Card), and you plan to keep those cards for 6 months, then you satisfy the requirement
- kgwxd 7y agoI was thinking about that, do those count? If so, do you have a source other than a random-fish-child-on-the-internet? Edit: Nevermind, "to the best of my knowledge" the free-for-everyone Capital One CreditWise service qualifies.
- jumbopapa 7y agoIs Credit Karma considered credit monitoring? They email me when any events take place.
- propogandist 7y agoNo, Credit Karma is a data mining front operation that takes the access you give them about your finances and sells them to other companies. Reliable financial data is hard for marketing companies to gather about individuals, CreditKarma solves that problem. If you read their privacy policy and ToS you'll learn they are able to sell your data as part of all the free services they provide you.
- sgc 7y agoYou are correct on their business model, but I would think receiving alerts from them would count.
- dehrmann 7y agoDespite their business model, I'd still recommend signing up as a fraud prevention measure. If you don't sign up, someone with a trivial amount of your info can sign up for an account and get more of your info, with the ultimate goal of identify theft.
- jedberg 7y ago> If you read their privacy policy and ToS you'll learn they are able to sell your data as part of all the free services they provide you. So my choices are let a 3rd party pay the credit agency for that info and I get nothing, or let CK pay the credit agency for that info and I get something for free. Sounds like CK is still the better deal.
- propogandist 7y agomost credit cards give you credit reports for free different cards (banks) have relationships with different credit unions, if you have a diverse portfolio of cards, you can get more reliable data than CK direct from the Credit Union for free (or for the annual fee of your card)
- scarface74 7y agoWhy would Credit Karma need to sell your data to other companies? Other companies already have the same high level access to your credit without you giving them permission to it. Credit Karma tries to sell you services based on your credit. Companies like Credit Karma or even companies like Facebook and Google don’t sell your data. They sell access to you based on the data they have. The distinction makes a big difference. If a law is passed saying that a company is not allowed to give out your data, it doesn’t really hurt companies.
- propogandist 7y ago
- LocalH 7y agoI just lied. shrug
- winslow 7y agoIt's okay, so did Equifax.
- unsined 7y agoDoes anyone know of any uber cheap monitoring services that last at least 6 months? Also, I suggest billing Equihax for time spent changing emails, phone numbers, etc to make your identity less susceptible ("the time you spent remedying fraud, identity theft, or other misuse of your personal information caused by the data breach, or purchasing credit monitoring or freezing credit reports, up to 20 total hours at $25 per hour.")
- mindslight 7y ago"Credit monitoring" is not limited to merely paying the surveillance companies themselves to give you a heads up if they're working on a new conspiracy against you. It is only within their own paradigm that the general concept of credit is subservient to their own databases. My credit is self monitored. Any credit/contract taken out claiming association with my public identifiers (eg name, SSN, etc) but without legal notice to my longstanding address of record is prima facie invalid. So I review all of the junk mail that comes into my mailbox, which does cost actual time, primarily due to the negligent operations of these ambient-authority-demanding surveillance shitheads.