2 ms·
Why not both? Also, nuclear has the whole radioactive waste and potential meltdown thing, which wind does not.
by CydeWeys 7y ago
Why not both?
Also, nuclear has the whole radioactive waste and potential meltdown thing, which wind does not.
- tracker1 7y agoI'm in favor of both. There are lots of very stable locations in the US. Far from flooding and earthquakes that are suitable. Similar for wind. I think solar should be limited to existing rooftops for now though.