True both situations are not good, however right's are still subject to legal requirements when being exercised. For example, the right to bear arms still requi

True both situations are not good, however right's are still subject to legal requirements when being exercised. For example, the right to bear arms still requires a background check to ensure you can own a weapon. You can also lose your right to vote if you commit a felony but this significant disenfranchisement affecting millions gets no coverage. Why is voting, which is critical to a democracy, considered onerous for requiring identification when driving, employment, banking, business and govt. programs all require it? Isn't that a strange balance?