3 ms·
Timothy Gowers had a similar point at https://plus.google.com/+TimothyGowers0/posts/4bkfusUoXot https://plus.google.com/+TimothyGowers0/posts/4bkfusUoXot (dead
by svat 7y ago
Timothy Gowers had a similar point at https://plus.google.com/+TimothyGowers0/posts/4bkfusUoXot https://plus.google.com/+TimothyGowers0/posts/4bkfusUoXot (dead link now):
> if one asks children a question such as the following: a number 35 bus pulls up at a bus stop and 8 passengers get on; what is the age of the bus driver? A large percentage of children, their minds numbed by years of symbol manipulation, will give the answer 43. This is a tragedy: rather than being trained to think, these children have been trained to do the opposite.
Also here: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/11/maths-isnt-problem-curriculum-lacking-imagination https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/11/maths-...
This is basic stimulus-response behaviour: school education is effectively a game that the children are playing to win points, and within that environment “thinking” is wasteful and disincentivized.
(See also: Lockhart's Lament https://www.maa.org/external_archive/devlin/LockhartsLament.pdf https://www.maa.org/external_archive/devlin/LockhartsLament...., the heart-breaking How Children Fail by John Holt, etc.)
Gowers also had a couple of posts on a very different way of teaching mathematics:
https://gowers.wordpress.com/2012/06/08/how-should-mathematics-be-taught-to-non-mathematicians/ https://gowers.wordpress.com/2012/06/08/how-should-mathemati...
https://gowers.wordpress.com/2012/07/07/a-trip-to-watford-grammar-school-for-boys/ https://gowers.wordpress.com/2012/07/07/a-trip-to-watford-gr...
- LeifCarrotson 7y agoThe same attitude persists long after graduation: if the task is to build a website/app/project, completing the project is what's measured and rewarded. Learning how to work with the tools provided isn't valued. At my previous shop, it was called a wasteful tendency for curiosity...until you urgently needed an answer that was only available because someone sought to answer a question that wasn't purely tied to a deliverable.
- dredmorbius 7y agoNB: Searching by numeric G+ UUID sometimes works, though in this case, the Wayback Machine seems not to have captured the URL: https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://plus.google.com/103703080789076472131/posts/4bkfusUoXot/ https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://plus.google.com/103703... There's a mapping of a few notable G+ usernames here, including Dr. Gowers: https://social.antefriguserat.de/index.php/G%2B_Notable_Names_Database https://social.antefriguserat.de/index.php/G%2B_Notable_Name... We tried. Sorry.
- svat 7y agoThanks for your efforts! Actually, despite ArchiveTeam's statement of having captured 98.6% of public profiles, I wasn't able to find a single post (let alone a complete list of posts) of a single person I cared about on the Wayback Machine as a result of the last-minute scraping (there were a few that had been crawled earlier): neither any of my friends, nor people like Timothy Gowers, Terence Tao, John Baez, Linus Torvalds, etc. I just assumed it had somehow not been uploaded to the Wayback Machine yet, but if it's gone... oh well. Such is life. Thanks again anyway!
- dredmorbius 7y agoIt's possible some content hasn't yet been ingested, though I'd thought it would be there by now. Just checked Archiveteam's pages, no clear info there.