2 ms·
It depends on your needs really. DO is fine for low budget projects. Just below them I would suggest Vultr. If you don't care about API's and that sort of th
by LinuxBender 7y ago
It depends on your needs really. DO is fine for low budget projects. Just below them I would suggest Vultr. If you don't care about API's and that sort of thing, then Ramnode is even cheaper, but I've had issues with the user interface.
There are a bunch of aggregator sites that compare vps providers. Here are two of them. [1] [2] [3]
Disclaimer: These sites can be a bit spammy. Use NoScript / uBlock. Also, you really do get what you pay for, so as your business grows, you may wish to consider diversifying across providers.
[1] - https://lowendbox.com/ https://lowendbox.com/
[2] - https://vpscomp.com/servers https://vpscomp.com/servers
[3] - https://www.serverhunter.com https://www.serverhunter.com as mentioned by
IronBacon, I totally forgot about this one.
- Havoc 7y ago>lowendbox.com Love it, but not sure that's a wise suggestion for someone clearly new to it all.
- LinuxBender 7y agoThe aggregator sites are certainly spammy and take time to get used to. I primarily linked them as a list of VPS providers, prices, etc.. One can always go directly to the VPS main site.
- Youden 7y agoRamnode also has at times outright hostile customer support and a blatant disregard for customer privacy. Strongly advise against them.
- LinuxBender 7y agoThey are for sure the bottom of the barrel. I threw that one in there because they have dirt cheap options.
- amouinam 7y agoCare to elaborate a bit more? I've experienced some network issues like parent mentioned, but otherwise I've thought of them as a fairly solid provider (atleast as a low-end provider).
- IronBacon 7y agoAlso https://www.serverhunter.com https://www.serverhunter.com