3 ms·

The difference is that those articles you've mentioned are not pushing a political agenda. You are pushing a political agenda. Not only is this not HN's use-cas

The difference is that those articles you've mentioned are not pushing a political agenda. You are pushing a political agenda. Not only is this not HN's use-case, but there is nothing here to discuss that hasn't already been discussed to death. What kind of intellectually stimulating discussion do you think will arise from a submission like this? If you really want mass exposure for your political crusade, there's Reddit for that. You'll receive 1000x the eyeballs, all the accolades, upvotes and Reddit Gold that you desire along with a nice echo-chamber of predictably inane comments.

La-ang 7y ago
You're only argumenting your own ideas here. What mass exposure are you talking about and eyeballs? I posted an update on a subject of the hour. Also, the main article I posted was derived from Bloomberg, and Bloomberg has no political agenda in Chinese affairs. Secondly, I have no political agenda in posting about the state of Hong Kong's affairs. You should be mindful of your words and claims that have no substantial grounds. My reposting was not a political push but a trigger to see why the flagging is not stopping. Dang has explained it already and I completely get his point, and agree to stop posting on it. You on the other hand, should refrain from emotionally arguing your points. Regards,
- tepidandroid 7y ago
  Apologies if my assumptions were wrong. I should have said "the articles you are submitting are pushing a political agenda". Being emotional has nothing to do with it. When I see five identical articles pushing the same political agenda, submitted by the same user at the same time (and more within the past week), one can only assume that the user has a political agenda. You could have easily just messaged the moderators to ask why your submissions were flagged instead of spamming the board and risking your account getting banned. As far as Bloomberg not having an agenda, please recall the as-of-yet unretracted and unproven Supermicro story.
  - La-ang 7y ago
    I do not speak for Bloomberg, solely the article. And maybe you're right, but I'm more of a brute force attack individual, although I love Nmap..

La-ang 7y ago

You're only argumenting your own ideas here. What mass exposure are you talking about and eyeballs? I posted an update on a subject of the hour. Also, the main article I posted was derived from Bloomberg, and Bloomberg has no political agenda in Chinese affairs. Secondly, I have no political agenda in posting about the state of Hong Kong's affairs. You should be mindful of your words and claims that have no substantial grounds. My reposting was not a political push but a trigger to see why the flagging is not stopping. Dang has explained it already and I completely get his point, and agree to stop posting on it. You on the other hand, should refrain from emotionally arguing your points. Regards,

tepidandroid 7y ago
Apologies if my assumptions were wrong. I should have said "the articles you are submitting are pushing a political agenda". Being emotional has nothing to do with it. When I see five identical articles pushing the same political agenda, submitted by the same user at the same time (and more within the past week), one can only assume that the user has a political agenda. You could have easily just messaged the moderators to ask why your submissions were flagged instead of spamming the board and risking your account getting banned. As far as Bloomberg not having an agenda, please recall the as-of-yet unretracted and unproven Supermicro story.
- La-ang 7y ago
  I do not speak for Bloomberg, solely the article. And maybe you're right, but I'm more of a brute force attack individual, although I love Nmap..