4 ms·
The moral is that embryos deserve the same rights as people, so you’re really just killing one person to save another
by dmonitor 7y ago
The moral is that embryos deserve the same rights as people, so you’re really just killing one person to save another
- rflrob 7y agoBut do rats (or other non-human animals) with human organs deserve the same rights as humans? I don't think that the human pancreas is the source of our innate "human-ness" that gives us distinct moral standing from non-human animals. You can certainly wonder whether there is any such thing that gives humans a special standing, but if you also eat pork, you have a tricky row to hoe in that argument.
- ddingus 7y agoNo it is not. Viability matters here. I realize you see that differently. Realize others will ALWAYS differ on this. ALWAYS. Frankly, this will absolutely be done. There probably will be wars over it too. And it still will be done. And then it will be done sans an embryo, using stems. Right now, powerful, wealthy people are paying full attention. The one thing they cannot buy will end up for sale. More time. Buckle up. It is going to get super ugly.
- diminoten 7y agoHe's not saying the idea is accurate, he's simply stating the idea. No need to argue unless you don't think he's representing the viewpoint accurately.
- ddingus 7y agoI think it is accurate, and we all see that how we see it. There is not a wrong, just grave differences, IMHO, unresolvable ones. At least for a considerable time. That was the intended point. People are going to really struggle over this area of tech. Not so much an argument as it is, look out. Incoming!
- socceroos 7y agoViability? That's a moral slippery slope if I ever saw one.
- sdinsn 7y agoAnd some people disagree with the fundamental basis of that moral.
- StreamBright 7y agoYes but according to most western countries where abortion is legal it doesn't matter.