4 ms·
"Type Safety" is only at position #12. I would have expected that nowadays C++ programmers would have been a little more aware of the perils of a not-strong-eno
by bestouff 7y ago
"Type Safety" is only at position #12. I would have expected that nowadays C++ programmers would have been a little more aware of the perils of a not-strong-enough type system.
- banachtarski 7y agoWe're already getting concepts, not sure why it'd be voted again
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- otabdeveloper4 7y agoC++ is already type-safe enough. The problem isn't a lack of language support, the problem is that programmers view safety as "needless boilerplate" and go to great lengths to subvert the language on safety issues.
- jcelerier 7y agoso, what would you do to add more type safety to C++ ?