> You confuse trade war with censorship. Indeed, but it's not for lack of trying. > exclusion is based on the content The pretext the speech falls short of i

> You confuse trade war with censorship. Indeed, but it's not for lack of trying. > exclusion is based on the content The pretext the speech falls short of inclusion in the category of "protected speech" because a different common thread can be drawn across its particulars is simply not convincing. Censoring speech in the basis of nationality instead of content doesn't making the underlying expression any less censored.