2 ms·
Why do we always have a comment like this completely missing the point about Github? If git was synonymous of Github, Microsoft would not have spent 7 billion t
by realusername 7y ago
Why do we always have a comment like this completely missing the point about Github? If git was synonymous of Github, Microsoft would not have spent 7 billion to buy it, there's a lot of features on top of git. And for me, whether it's a decision of the US government or Github does not matter much.
- fortran77 7y agoMaybe Microsoft missed the point of it! I don't use github. I use Amazon CodeCommit. The fact is, github adds value because it isn't "decentralized". And any organization that runs something will have people that disagree with it and/or government regulations it will need to follow. git, however, it nicely distributed and you can host a repo anywhere you want and be discoverable through other means.
- realusername 7y agoYou do still use Github if you have any popular dependency in your project, which you probably do. The point is that when it's decentralised, nobody would be able to take the repo down that easily or prevent someone access to public repo due to arbitrary rules.
- reallydude 7y ago> The fact is, github adds value because it isn't "decentralized" Exactly. It's the most popular brand, same as Disney buying Hulu. Not to make Hulu into Disney, but to bring the customers into an arena for control. While I do not use github, npm does, for example.