3 ms·
You're describing a broken and unusable cryptosystem. What you believe requires "substantial computation" to break today requires a consumer GPU tomorrow. The
by jki275 7y ago
You're describing a broken and unusable cryptosystem. What you believe requires "substantial computation" to break today requires a consumer GPU tomorrow.
There is no minimizing the risk. Your concept is broken. It does not -- and cannot -- provide security of any use. And I don't care what the government thinks about it.
- masscrypteria 7y agoPre quantum algos have this shortcoming built in
- jki275 7y agoWord salad.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- masscrypteria 7y agoIt’s just a brainstorming idea. There would be a key as well - the idea would require both the key and substantial computational power for exceptional access Brainstorming ideas are meant to be thrown out. Attacking the idea respectfully is fine. It’s to help inspire other ideas. Of course there’s a trade off involved. But whether it’s two party encryption or three party encryption with exceptional access none is perfectly secure anyway. There is major conflation of political ideologies with hardline technical viewpoints going on