What you will may be subjective, but your ability to bend others to your choices is not. Thus I'd argue power is objective. Righteousness occurs as a value ass

What you will may be subjective, but your ability to bend others to your choices is not. Thus I'd argue power is objective. Righteousness occurs as a value assessment within a moral framework. When all values, including opposing values, are of equal worth, we have a framework of amorality, which cannot ever produce a judgement of righteousness or wickedness. In other words, the term itself reduces the frameworks which fit. All of the remaining frameworks require active choice (as far as I understand).