3 ms·
Anonymity, presumably. That said, you'd think there would be no reason that whatever real-world authority is ensuring no one extracts more than their purchased
by mikepurvis 7y ago
Anonymity, presumably. That said, you'd think there would be no reason that whatever real-world authority is ensuring no one extracts more than their purchased credits allow would already have all the secret information and could just be the clearing house for the transactions.
- heavenlyblue 7y agoTruly, one would think you’d still need an authority to connect the water supply usage to the blockchain per se.
- blaser-waffle 7y agoFarmers are on large plots, and there is only so much watertable. Why do they need to be anonymous? Sounds like more blockchain hype + the hidden potential for Nestle or whoever to buy up all the water rights discretely. Utilities should not be anonymous.