stoked to see this on multiple fronts: - someone with a vested interest + some modicum of power can hold .google's feet to the fire on this issue and will like

stoked to see this on multiple fronts: - someone with a vested interest + some modicum of power can hold .google's feet to the fire on this issue and will likely hammer the point home even post-settlement or whatever (remember when they out of the blue suspended my ad account?...) - Tulsi maybe gets more exposure as a candidate, leading people to her anti-war ideals, which may influence other candidates admittedly haven't heard google's side but there's precedent here for them committing unwarranted screw ups. of course, if the campaign did do something naughty that'd be a pretty big self inflicted wound.