4 ms·
The implications of uniqueness through multiple seemingly innocuous data points are quite worrisome in a wider context. For example, in the digital sphere, if X
by shadowprofile77 7y ago
The implications of uniqueness through multiple seemingly innocuous data points are quite worrisome in a wider context. For example, in the digital sphere, if X person has a certain pattern of sites visited, browsing habits and so forth, and then tries to anonymize themselves as person Y for browsing in a way that has no direct connection to any of their regular online accounts, a third party correlating even a small amount of browsing and even vague location data by a bunch of unknown activity profiles could presumably then quickly identify that one of them, Y has a high chance of being X. Or if a bunch of online comment text, buying habits, random basic information or whatever from known person profile X were used to search for similar data points among random people, then correlated together, finding out that Y (who is X but decided to change their physical address, country of residence and so forth for personal reasons) matches very closely with X and is thus very likely to be X seems very easy.
- shadowprofile77 7y agoThis could apply to simple text analysis too. some agent looking for now disappeared person X collects a bunch of their known comment, email, chat text, search pattern text and looks for certain distinct words, word patterns and so forth among these things then searches for similar correlations across a broad, maybe global swath of general chat, social media, email, comment, search posting and also correlates some of the sites involved with keyword similarities to easily identify X as Y even though Y has completely disconnected from anything having to do with having been X