4 ms·
I would rephrase this as 1. Support the new value in your schema 2. Support the new value in the client 3. Emit the new value from the server Combining 1 an
by joshuamorton 7y ago
I would rephrase this as
1. Support the new value in your schema
2. Support the new value in the client
3. Emit the new value from the server
Combining 1 and 2 is probably possible, but not a great idea. Imagine if you end up rolling back 2 and 3, but there are still potentially new values in flight. If 1 is still there, you're good. If 1 and 2 are combined, you rollback all 3, but the new value is still in flight and your client crashes.
- aeorgnoieang 7y agoThe advice seemed to be to, first, support (i.e. correctly ignore) any possibly new value in both the client and server (i.e. any client of the 'schema').
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]