4 ms·
Ok that's a good point. A problem could be that people in general don't care about: "increases the power of the government against the innocent" -- because tha
by HappyDreamer 7y ago
Ok that's a good point.
A problem could be that people in general don't care about: "increases the power of the government against the innocent" -- because that's a theoretical problem in the "distant" future?
Personally I think the US gov getting too much power and gradually in small steps get access to "everyone's" communication, is like 1000 times more dangerous than "encrypted terrorism messages",
and, what can be a good way to make people in general better understand the risks & dangers with small steps towards a dictatorship? Maybe if everyone reads 1984 :- / or if everyone was better educated about what happens if you're in China an critizise the government there?
I didn't mean literally all lawmakers etc (although that's what I wrote). The next time I can try to write "some of them" instead.
- dllthomas 7y agoOne part of the solution is probably to raise awareness of the ways that systems justified in these ways are already being abused. For instance, spying on romantic interests at the NSA was apparently common enough that they had a cutesy name for it.