3 ms·
Sprinklers are not sized to work simultaneously and building codes dont handle arsons. The size if the system would be enormous. Adequate escape routes (e.g. to
by antman 7y ago
Sprinklers are not sized to work simultaneously and building codes dont handle arsons. The size if the system would be enormous.
Adequate escape routes (e.g. to the roof) could be more helpful.
- zaarn 7y agoThe roof is rarely a good escape route unless there are several ladders going down the ground. Even then, in my country, this would likely not pass inspection as 30meters of horizontal and 30 meters of vertical movement are the maximum for fire escape routes to a safe place (ie, a fire shielded stair case with no fire hazards, which requires special doors and monitoring that no flammable materials are stored there plus ventilation, or simply the outside of the building on the ground). The roof is dangersou because if the fire gets too large, the fire fighters will be forced to switch from extinguish to control and the roof might be burned down. If nobody notices you up there or equipment to get you down takes too long, you're screwed. On the ground you can get more distance.
- userbinator 7y agoSprinklers would've at least slowed the spread of the fire even if they weren't able to extinguish (this is a common misconception --- not all sprinkler systems are designed to extinguish fires.) Water has a very high heat capacity and large amounts of it will help keep the temperature from rising. Yes, the water will cause damage, which may be why they decided against sprinklers in the first place, but arguably the fire damage is worse.