A fun read and primer on the subject. However, I would like to see more emphasis on including a time stamp as part of the signed payload. The reason is multifol

A fun read and primer on the subject. However, I would like to see more emphasis on including a time stamp as part of the signed payload. The reason is multifold: (a) Most importantly prevents ‘replay attacks’ [1]. Systems that need to send send the same command will do so with a unique time stamp and, therefore, a unique signature. (b) The time stamp + signature is an idempotency key. Your key cache’s TTL is the same as the timeout for your time stamp rejections. (c) To a lesser extent bolsters the system against a brute force length extension attack (see the Flickr API flaw in the reading) by reducing the time the middle-man has to correctly calculate the glue bytes. 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replay_attack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replay_attack