6 ms·
I don't really agree. I think motion smoothing is a gimmick. Like 3d and curved TVs before it. It gave another metric (besides size) for manufacturers to compet
by jgalentine007 7y ago
I don't really agree. I think motion smoothing is a gimmick. Like 3d and curved TVs before it. It gave another metric (besides size) for manufacturers to compete on - 60hz, 120hz, 240hz etc.
Motion smoothing just doesn't look better, especially when it is poorly implemented (the norm) - the motion tends to speed up and slow down, which is worse than the judder it is supposed to fix.
Even properly sourced hi frame rate material looks bad - I saw the Hobbit in HFR and it was difficult to watch the seemingly fake production - my mind could no longer be tricked because there was so much detail in each second for it to reason with. Nevermind the extra lengths that Peter Jackson had to go through to properly light the film, and the extra detail needed in the set work, costumes and makeup.
Change my mind!
- dTal 7y agoIt's still a generational, subjective, relearn-able thing. Assuming it's true that high framerates make it harder to trick the eye - so what? Nobody complained about Yoda blatantly being a puppet. There are lots of dimensions in which you can suspend your disbelief. If your assertion is true, it simply means we have to suspend our disbelief in makeup, set design etc just a little bit more, in exchange for vastly more realistic motion and artistic space in which to put detail. I think it's a win - I bet set design got a lot harder with the switch to color, too.