Could you explain your view in a calmer and clearer way than Motl? I’m curious whether there’s any “there” there, so to speak. QD as described in Ball’s articl

Could you explain your view in a calmer and clearer way than Motl? I’m curious whether there’s any “there” there, so to speak. QD as described in Ball’s article sounds very sensible to me, and Motl’s objections sound like he misunderstands the article and would actually mostly agree with QD.