I used to just be repulsed by talk like this, but I've started to find it interesting. Its useful to tease out what is meant here. Experts - when we think of t

I used to just be repulsed by talk like this, but I've started to find it interesting. Its useful to tease out what is meant here. Experts - when we think of them, we think of professionals with experience, people who've done research on the subjects, and in general just people who are better informed than the public. What I think the people who say things like "enough with the experts", I find it to be entirely within a political/media context - many of whom are paid lobbyists, industry representatives, people with a lot of paper qualifications with their own agenda, etc. AKA, bullshit artists. A call against them is a call against systemic corruption, since they are a primary tool the powerful use to keep the public's consent. The other side of that is a blanket callout against all experts obviously is just anti-intellectualism. This pessimistic worldview is that well since we can't tell which experts are telling the truth, I'm going to go with what I believe, and not listen to anything to the contrary. This is quite easy to criticize - however I think that those that criticize it aren't always taking into account that they do it as well, even if less often or on a less global scale.