3 ms·
Just out of curiosity, does that extend to things like chemical or biological weapons? I suppose such an interpretation would have the side effect of making li
by Coffeewine 7y ago
Just out of curiosity, does that extend to things like chemical or biological weapons?
I suppose such an interpretation would have the side effect of making literally any hazardous substance legal to possess.
- homonculus1 7y agoThe definition of "arms" can reasonably be limited to conventional arms, i.e. the weapon is controlled by a human and its damage can be targeted. Weapons of mass destruction and contagion are not compatible with the purposes of self-defense, defense of the nation, and protecting society against tyranny.