3 ms·
It's actually about respecting the fact that women are great judges of men. They're designed to be super discerning. So if a high-value woman singles out a gu
by brandnewlow 16y ago
It's actually about respecting the fact that women are great judges of men. They're designed to be super discerning. So if a high-value woman singles out a guy as worth her time, it's a safe bet that he's worth your time, too.
- JonnieCache 16y ago>the fact that women are great judges of men I'm assuming that by great you mean better than men are of women. What evidence do you have for this, apart from the dubious[1] field of evolutionary psychology? Also, could you define your terms better? What aspects of men are women great at judging? They are, after all, not psychic. [1] http://www.badscience.net/category/evolutionary-psychology/ http://www.badscience.net/category/evolutionary-psychology/
- Waywocket 16y ago>t's actually about respecting the fact that women are great judges of men. They're designed to be super discerning. So if a high-value woman singles out a guy as worth her time, it's a safe bet that he's worth your time, too. What? Women are terrible judges of men. Probably even worse than men are.