They knowingly and with intent implemented spying functionality, and knowingly and with intent made a button that claims to turn it off. The only part they migh

They knowingly and with intent implemented spying functionality, and knowingly and with intent made a button that claims to turn it off. The only part they might not have done knowingly and with intent is the part where that button does nothing. Now they're free to argue that was a bug, but they should do so in court - just how much benefit of the doubt do you think they should get before a prosecution is launched? If there's a murder, do you just assume it was in self-defense, without any evidence offered to that effect?