3 ms·
this is a hit piece. it is likely that they either manipulated the time period in which the data was taken or they cherry picked the towns the took the data fro
by whenanother 7y ago
this is a hit piece. it is likely that they either manipulated the time period in which the data was taken or they cherry picked the towns the took the data from. most likely they did both. with a population of over a billion. it is easy to manipulate population numbers. what they did is find towns with only one or two births for a given time period and selected a time period that would push their narrative.
the other possibility is that these towns have some messed laws that encourages people to not register their daughter’s birth. this is an issue in many countries and people just ignore these rules and just register their kids in the most beneficial way. of course racist people will take this and claim misogyny.
there is a logical disconnect of people stereotyping countries with the largest population as mistreating females. the lack of critical thinking is appalling. it takes nearly a year to birth a child and requires that the female is a willing participant. they have done this more times in india than in most other countries.
- em-bee 7y agomanipulated numbers to what end? you think the gender disparity is not real? china has the same disparity. you can find it in official reports by the chinese government. so it's real, all right. why would india not have the same problem? do you have evidence for your claim?